Short answer for investors

Romania proposes six Black Sea offshore wind areas totalling about 11.5 GW. We explain the concession path, grid, defence, petroleum and investor risks.

Why this matters in practice

Romania’s proposal identifies:

Quick answer

Romania’s proposal identifies:

  • 3.1 GW in Phase 1, intended for near-term fixed-foundation development
  • 2.4 GW in Phase 2, comprising technically attractive areas affected by major military constraints
  • 6 GW in Phase 3, consisting of a long-term deep-water development zone that may require floating technology.

The total proposed pipeline is approximately 11.5 GW across 3,848 km².

Phase 1 is intended to support Romania’s national objective of installing approximately 3 GW of offshore wind by 2035. The full 11.5 GW list is therefore broader than the first contemplated concession round and should be understood as a strategic, multi-decade pipeline.

---

Source documents

Readers may review the three underlying documents directly:

1. Draft Government Decision approving the offshore wind concession areas

2. Substantiation note to the draft Government Decision

3. Technical annex containing the proposed areas, coordinates, capacities and constraints

The proposal was published through the Ministry of Energy’s decision-making transparency section on 22 July 2026.

---

1. Why the proposal matters

Romania adopted Law no. 121/2024 on offshore wind energy in May 2024. The law established the primary legislative framework for the concession, exploration, construction and operation of offshore wind projects in the Romanian Black Sea.

Among other matters, the law requires the Government, acting upon the proposal of the Ministry of Energy, to approve the list of concessionable offshore wind perimeters based on a specialist study. The areas must be defined through topogeodetic coordinates and assessed against the Romanian maritime spatial plan, environmental considerations and national-security restrictions.

The draft Government Decision now seeks to implement that requirement.

The statutory deadline provided by Law no. 121/2024 for approving the list was 31 March 2025. The publication of the draft on 22 July 2026 therefore comes approximately 16 months after the original legislative deadline. This delay is relevant from an investor perspective because offshore wind development depends on a long chain of sequential and interdependent actions.

Nevertheless, the publication remains a major regulatory milestone. Without legally defined concession areas, the Ministry of Energy cannot progress meaningfully toward the competitive award of offshore wind rights.

2. The proposed 11.5 GW offshore wind pipeline

The technical annex identifies five proposed concession perimeters and one broader development zone.

Development phaseProposed areasEstimated capacityEstimated surfaceExpected technology
Phase 1 — short termPerimeters 1, 2 and 33.1 GW948 km²Fixed foundations
Phase 2 — medium termPerimeters 4 and 52.4 GW705 km²Fixed foundations
Phase 3 — long termDevelopment Zone 66 GW2,195 km²Fixed, deep-water fixed or floating
TotalFive perimeters and one development zone11.5 GW3,848 km²Mixed

The stated capacities are planning estimates. They should not be treated as guaranteed auction capacities or as the final installed capacity that will remain available after detailed site investigations, environmental assessments, defence clearances, petroleum coexistence arrangements and grid studies.

The annex also provides relative levelised cost of energy indicators. These are comparative indices rather than absolute EUR/MWh projections and should not be used as bankable cost estimates.

---

3. Phase 1: Romania’s immediate 3.1 GW opportunity

Phase 1 contains three areas considered suitable for fixed-foundation offshore wind projects using currently available technologies.

The substantiation note links this 3.1 GW phase directly to Romania’s national objective of installing approximately 3 GW of offshore wind by 2035.

Perimeter 1: the anchor opportunity

IndicatorPublished value
Estimated capacity1,900 MW
Estimated surface631 km²
Nominal density3 MW/km²
Average wind speed at 150 metres7.8 m/s
Water depth63–75 metres
Foundation typeFixed
Relative LCOE index1.036

Perimeter 1 accounts for approximately 61% of the entire Phase 1 capacity. Its successful development would therefore be critical to Romania’s ability to approach the 3 GW target by 2035.

The area is nevertheless affected by material coexistence issues. The annex identifies:

legally protected areas toward the north
vessel traffic, including the Odesa–Bosporus corridor, toward the east
a sensitive military area
fisheries and aquaculture sensitivity across approximately 85% of the area
underwater cultural heritage sensitivity across the whole area
petroleum and gas infrastructure affecting approximately 95%
overlaps with the Istria and XV Midia petroleum exploration areas.

From a commercial perspective, Perimeter 1 offers scale and potentially greater flexibility to optimise turbine placement. However, its size does not eliminate the need for detailed petroleum, environmental, military and navigation agreements.

Perimeter 2: compact and relatively dense

IndicatorPublished value
Estimated capacity600 MW
Estimated surface149 km²
Nominal density4 MW/km²
Average wind speed7.9 m/s
Water depth55–67 metres
Foundation typeFixed
Relative LCOE index1.057

Perimeter 2 combines relatively shallow water, a comparatively high nominal density and a manageable 600 MW project scale.

Its principal constraints include:

vessel activity to the north and east
petroleum and gas infrastructure toward the south
a sensitive military area toward the west
moderate bat and protected-habitat sensitivity across the whole area
marine mammal sensitivity across approximately 90%
fisheries and underwater heritage sensitivity across 100%
the EX-25 Luceafărul exploration area.

Because Perimeter 2 is considerably smaller than Perimeter 1, developers may have less internal flexibility to relocate turbines and cables away from sensitive zones.

Perimeter 3: a more challenging Phase 1 proposition

IndicatorPublished value
Estimated capacity600 MW
Estimated surface168 km²
Nominal density3.6 MW/km²
Average wind speed7.7 m/s
Water depth65–75 metres
Foundation typeFixed
Relative LCOE index1.145

On the published information, Perimeter 3 appears to have the least favourable technical-cost profile of the Phase 1 areas.

It has:

the lowest stated Phase 1 wind speed
relatively deep water
the highest Phase 1 relative LCOE indicator
petroleum and gas infrastructure sensitivity across 100%
underwater cultural heritage sensitivity across 100%
complete moderate sensitivity for bats and marine mammals
an overlap with the Neptun XIX 1 exploration area.

This does not mean that Perimeter 3 is unviable. It may, however, require different pricing assumptions, more selective consortium interest or differentiated auction treatment.

---

4. Phase 2: potentially stronger economics, but major defence constraints

Phase 2 contains two areas with a combined capacity of approximately 2.4 GW.

The annex explains that the areas were not included in Phase 1 because of overlaps with military zones and military buffers that would need to be relocated or otherwise resolved before development.

Perimeter 4: the strongest technical profile in the package

IndicatorPublished value
Estimated capacity800 MW
Estimated surface187 km²
Nominal density4.3 MW/km²
Average wind speed8.0 m/s
Water depth46–56 metres
Foundation typeFixed
Relative LCOE index0.979

Perimeter 4 has:

the highest published wind speed
the shallowest water
the highest nominal power density
the lowest relative LCOE indicator.

From a purely technical and cost-comparison perspective, it appears to be the strongest area in the entire package.

However:

approximately 90% overlaps publicly known military areas
approximately 90% overlaps sensitive military areas
approximately 80% is affected by known unexploded ordnance sensitivity
the area is also affected by navigation, protected-area and aviation considerations.

This is an important market signal. The order in which Romanian offshore wind areas may be developed is not determined solely by wind resource or theoretical LCOE. National security, maritime use and institutional readiness are equally decisive.

Perimeter 5: scale, but extensive military and petroleum overlap

IndicatorPublished value
Estimated capacity1,600 MW
Estimated surface518 km²
Nominal density3 MW/km²
Average wind speed7.8 m/s
Water depth58–76 metres
Foundation typeFixed
Relative LCOE index1.010

Perimeter 5 is the second-largest proposed project area after Perimeter 1.

The principal constraints are:

sensitive military areas across approximately 90%
petroleum and gas infrastructure across approximately 90%
fisheries sensitivity across approximately 95%
underwater cultural heritage sensitivity across 100%
vessel and navigation interfaces
overlap with the Neptun XIX 1 exploration area.

Perimeter 5 may become a valuable medium-term opportunity, but only after a credible institutional solution is reached concerning military use and offshore petroleum infrastructure.

---

5. Phase 3: a 6 GW long-term strategic reserve

Development Zone 6

IndicatorPublished value
Estimated capacity6,000 MW
Estimated surface2,195 km²
Nominal density2.7 MW/km²
Average wind speed7.8 m/s
Water depth63–135 metres
TechnologyFixed, deep-water fixed or floating
Relative LCOE index1.138

Development Zone 6 represents more than half of the total proposed 11.5 GW pipeline.

The area is fundamentally different from the five identified concession perimeters. It is described as a development zone, potentially containing future project areas, rather than as a clearly defined near-term project.

The annex indicates that:

parts of the area may require deep-water fixed foundations
other parts may require floating offshore wind technology
projects are likely to be developed only after 2035
sensitive military areas affect approximately 20%
petroleum and gas infrastructure affects approximately 85%
underwater cultural heritage sensitivity covers the entire zone
five petroleum exploration areas are relevant: EX-27 Muridava, EX-28 Est Cobălcescu, Istria, XV Midia and Neptun XX 2.

The terminology creates a point that should be clarified in the final legal instrument. The operative Government Decision approves concessionable “perimeters,” while the annex refers to Zone 6 as a broader “development zone.”

It should therefore be made clear whether Zone 6 will itself be capable of immediate concession or whether future concession perimeters will be selected and separately approved from within it.

---

6. How the Romanian offshore wind legal pathway is expected to work

The draft Government Decision is one component of a wider legal and regulatory framework.

In broad terms, the project-development pathway is expected to include the following stages.

Stage 1: approval of the concessionable areas

The Government adopts the list of concessionable offshore wind areas based on the Ministry of Energy’s proposal and the underlying specialist study.

This is the stage addressed by the current draft package.

Stage 2: preparation of the competitive concession procedure

The Ministry of Energy must prepare the detailed concession documentation, including:

qualification requirements
award criteria
bidder guarantees
technical and financial milestones
concession duration
termination rights
development obligations
transfer and change-of-control rules
interaction with any support scheme
treatment of site data and coexistence risks.

These matters are not determined by the current draft.

Stage 3: bidder eligibility and Romanian presence

Law no. 121/2024 establishes eligibility conditions for participation in the competitive concession procedure.

A foreign legal entity must have a Romanian subsidiary in place by the date on which its bid is submitted. That Romanian entity must hold the rights and obligations resulting from the concession contract. Other requirements concern solvency, tax compliance, sanctions, criminal convictions, State-aid recovery decisions and the status of the bidder as an undertaking in difficulty.

For international developers, this means that Romanian corporate structuring will not be merely a post-award implementation matter. It will form part of bid preparation.

Stage 4: concession contract and exploration permit

Following the competitive award, the successful developer enters into a concession contract with the Ministry of Energy.

The Ministry subsequently issues the exploration permit to the concessionaire.

The exploration stage will be essential for confirming:

seabed and geotechnical conditions
wind resource
environmental baseline data
marine archaeology
unexploded ordnance
cable routes
foundation solutions
project layout
interaction with petroleum infrastructure.

Stage 5: grid connection

ANRE has adopted a dedicated regulation governing the connection of offshore wind power plants to the electricity transmission grid through Order no. 92/2024. The regulation establishes the stages and procedures applicable to offshore users seeking connection to the transmission system.

The existence of a regulatory procedure is positive. However, the current perimeter documents do not identify:

specific onshore connection points
offshore substations
export cable corridors
landfall locations
available grid capacity
reinforcement requirements
responsibility for offshore transmission assets
the allocation of connection and reinforcement costs.

These remain among the most important bankability questions.

Stage 6: ANRE establishment authorisation

The current ANRE licensing framework requires an offshore wind establishment-authorisation applicant to provide, among other documents:

the exploration permit
the concession contract
the final exploration report
evidence of rights over relevant offshore and onshore property
the technical-economic description of the project
details of the offshore wind area
submarine export cables
onshore electrical installations up to the connection point.

This confirms that the concession and exploration stage must produce a sufficiently mature technical project before the ANRE authorisation process can be completed.

Stage 7: development approval

Law no. 121/2024 defines the development approval as an act with effects equivalent to a building permit. It covers offshore works within the concession area and the relevant onshore works up to the connection with the electricity transmission system.

The establishment authorisation and development approval give the concessionaire the legal basis required to construct the offshore wind power plant and the relevant connection works.

Stage 8: construction, testing and commercial operation

The project must subsequently complete:

construction
technical compliance procedures
grid testing
commissioning
ANRE licensing
environmental and operational compliance
any obligations imposed through the concession and support arrangements.

The current proposal does not alter or replace these downstream requirements.

---

7. Grid capacity may become the decisive constraint

The absence of a project-specific transmission strategy is the most significant missing element in the current package.

Romania’s offshore wind projects will connect into the south-eastern part of the national electricity system, particularly the Dobrogea region.

Romania’s maritime spatial plan already recognises that Dobrogea combines:

significant existing renewable generation
planned additional renewable capacity
major nuclear developments at Cernavodă
relatively limited local electricity demand.

It also identifies grid connection costs, transmission capacity and the distance between offshore projects and the coast as major challenges.

This creates several strategic questions.

8. The future revenue model will determine investment appetite

Law no. 121/2024 contemplates the development of a support scheme for offshore wind. The Ministry of Energy is responsible for defining its objectives, award mechanism, duration and financing source, subject to State-aid rules.

The current perimeter package does not establish that scheme.

Romania does, however, have relevant experience with competitive two-way Contracts for Difference for onshore wind and solar photovoltaic projects. The first two Romanian CfD auctions awarded a combined 4.2 GW of supported renewable capacity.

This experience may assist Romania in designing an offshore mechanism, but an offshore auction will require different risk treatment.

Offshore wind projects typically have:

higher development expenditure
longer development periods
greater construction and interface risks
specialised supply-chain requirements
significant exposure to inflation, interest rates and foreign-exchange movements
greater sensitivity to delay, curtailment and grid availability.

The eventual revenue-support framework will need to address issues such as:

Source status and connected advice

The analysis is based on the Ministry of Energy's draft Government Decision, substantiation note and technical annex published on 22 July 2026. These are consultation documents and may change before adoption. The final text should be checked through the Ministry of Energy's transparency section and the Official Gazette.

For project strategy, Romanian renewable energy legal services should be coordinated with grid and permitting advice, energy M&A and project finance and technical development and bankability review. An investor entering a consortium should also test the project assumptions through technical due diligence.

This article is general information, based on the documents available on 27 July 2026, and is not legal or technical advice for a particular Black Sea area.

Frequently asked questions

How much offshore wind capacity is in Romania's proposal?

The draft package identifies six Black Sea areas with an indicative aggregate potential of about 11.5 GW. The figure is a planning estimate, not awarded or guaranteed capacity.

Does the draft Government Decision award offshore wind projects?

No. It identifies areas that may be concessioned. Competitive procedures, project-specific studies, permits, grid rights and financing would still be required.

What is the main investor risk?

Grid integration is the system-level constraint, while defence, petroleum, navigation and environmental coexistence can materially affect the usable area and development timetable.

When could projects be built?

The draft areas begin a multi-stage concession and permitting process. Commercial operation depends on final rules, auctions, transmission solutions and project-specific approvals, so no reliable commissioning date can yet be guaranteed.