Technical advisory Romania
Grigorescu Partners supports investors, developers, lenders and project owners with independent technical review from development and due diligence through construction, commissioning and COD. We connect engineering evidence, project controls and grid readiness to the commercial decisions that determine value, bankability and completion.
We test whether project claims are supported by designs, studies, contracts and site records.
Grid, technology, EPC, programme and commercial assumptions are reviewed as one delivery system.
Findings become prioritised actions, monitoring points, acceptance criteria and decision gates.
Where we fit
Technical risk becomes commercially relevant when it affects project maturity, capex, schedule, grid readiness, output, warranties or completion. We provide owner-side and lender-side technical evidence while Energy Law handles legal rights, permits, contracts and regulatory conclusions.
What we do
We test the technical evidence that changes project maturity, value, bankability, programme, performance or acceptance.
Concept, design basis, site constraints, grid assumptions, capex and delivery strategy before investment.
Independent review of technology, design, yield, grid, constructability, programme, capex and risks.
Bankability, construction monitoring, drawdown review, testing and completion evidence.
Owner-side design review, EPC oversight, interfaces, quality, change and technical decisions.
How we help
The output is designed for investors, lenders, owners and management teams: material risks, decision gates, accountable actions and evidence still required.
Set the investment, financing, delivery or acceptance decision the technical work must support.
Review the documents, calculations, interfaces and site records that can change that decision.
Convert findings into priorities, owners, deadlines, monitoring points and completion evidence.
When we help
When project maturity, capex, schedule or production assumptions need independent challenge.
When lenders need a bankability view and a monitorable construction and completion path.
When design, EPC, grid, quality and programme interfaces require owner-side control.
When tests, defects, performance and completion evidence must support a release or decision.
Workstreams
Concept, design basis, site constraints, grid assumptions, capex and delivery strategy before investment.
Independent review of technology, design, yield, grid, constructability, programme, capex and risks.
Bankability, construction monitoring, drawdown review, testing and completion evidence.
Owner-side design review, EPC oversight, interfaces, quality, change and technical decisions.
Programme, cost, procurement, contractors, reporting, quality and site coordination.
Studies, protection, energisation, acceptance tests, defects, performance and completion.
Client scenarios
Challenge maturity, yield, grid and capex assumptions before price and exclusivity harden.
Define bankability gaps, construction monitoring and drawdown evidence around the actual configuration.
Control EPC, grid, testing, defects and completion interfaces through a single decision record.
How we work
Set the investment, financing, delivery or acceptance decision the technical work must support.
Review the documents, calculations, interfaces and site records that can change that decision.
Convert findings into priorities, owners, deadlines, monitoring points and completion evidence.
Technical leadership
Ovidiu Bălașa brings more than 14 years of technical and project-management experience across energy and infrastructure.
His experience includes the development and delivery of more than 200 MW of Romanian wind projects, technical and commercial review of RTB solar, C&I solar delivery, Transelectrica interfaces, EPC, Owner's Engineering, PPAs, lender due diligence, commissioning and COD.
MSc in Renewable Energy Sources and BSc in Power Engineering
ANRE IIA and IIB authorisations
Experience from RTB and financing through construction, commissioning and COD
Primary sources
These links support primary-source verification; the applicable requirements still depend on project facts and timing.
FAQ
It is independent review and delivery support covering design, technology, grid, yield, constructability, cost, programme, quality, testing and completion so an investor, lender or owner can make an evidence-based decision.
No. Technical advisory tests engineering and delivery evidence. Energy Law reviews legal rights, permits, regulatory status and contracts. Many acquisitions and financings require coordinated but clearly separated workstreams.
Yes, the scope may include Owner's Engineering, project controls, construction monitoring, grid-interface support, commissioning oversight and completion assessment, subject to an agreed mandate.
Start with the file
We will identify the appropriate review depth, required information and whether the mandate should combine technical and Energy Law workstreams.
