Lender's technical advisory
We support lenders and financing parties with technical bankability review, construction monitoring, drawdown assessment, commissioning oversight and completion reporting for Romanian solar, wind and BESS projects. The mandate follows the risks that affect debt assumptions, use of funds, schedule and completion.
Technical assumptions are tested against the financing case and project contracts.
Progress, cost-to-complete and material risks are reviewed before recommendations.
Testing, defects, permits and evidence are tracked against agreed completion criteria.
Where we fit
The technical advisor provides independent engineering and delivery assessment. Legal due diligence, security, conditions precedent and enforceability are handled separately by lender counsel and the Energy Law team.
What we do
We test the technical evidence that changes project maturity, value, bankability, programme, performance or acceptance.
Technology, design, yield, grid, capex, programme, contracts and risk allocation.
EPC, supply, O&M, warranties, security, testing and direct-agreement interfaces.
Budget, sources and uses, schedule, procurement, contingency and reporting controls.
Site progress, invoices, change, cost-to-complete, risks and drawdown evidence.
How we help
The output is designed for investors, lenders, owners and management teams: material risks, decision gates, accountable actions and evidence still required.
Define the technical assumptions and completion criteria embedded in the financing.
Test reported progress, cost and risk against documents and site evidence.
Provide concise exceptions, conditions and recommendations for lender action.
When we help
To identify technical bankability issues affecting structure or appetite.
To confirm the baseline, contracts, budget and completion path.
To assess progress, use of funds, cost-to-complete and emerging risk.
To verify testing, defects and evidence against the financing definition.
Workstreams
Technology, design, yield, grid, capex, programme, contracts and risk allocation.
EPC, supply, O&M, warranties, security, testing and direct-agreement interfaces.
Budget, sources and uses, schedule, procurement, contingency and reporting controls.
Site progress, invoices, change, cost-to-complete, risks and drawdown evidence.
Test plans, grid compliance, defects, performance and acceptance records.
Evidence against agreed technical completion and outstanding-item criteria.
Client scenarios
Review yield, grid, EPC, budget and programme before close and through construction.
Challenge degradation, warranties, safety, revenue interfaces and completion tests.
Assess historic performance, defects, remaining life and major-maintenance exposure.
How we work
Define the technical assumptions and completion criteria embedded in the financing.
Test reported progress, cost and risk against documents and site evidence.
Provide concise exceptions, conditions and recommendations for lender action.
Primary sources
These links support primary-source verification; the applicable requirements still depend on project facts and timing.
FAQ
The advisor independently reviews bankability, technical contracts, budget and schedule, then monitors construction, drawdowns, testing and completion for the financing parties.
The advisor usually reviews evidence and makes recommendations under the agreed scope; the lender retains the financing decision.
Testing, grid compliance, defects, performance, permits, documentation, cost and outstanding work are checked against the agreed completion definition.
Start with the file
We will identify the bankability, monitoring and completion work required for the credit process.
