Technical due diligence Romania
We support buyers, sellers and financing parties with technical due diligence of Romanian solar, wind and BESS projects. The review tests whether design, technology, yield, grid, capex, schedule, contracts and execution evidence support the claimed project stage and investment case.
Findings are ranked by value, programme, output and remediation consequence.
Claims are traced to calculations, studies, designs, contracts and records.
Risks become price questions, conditions, reserves, remediation or monitoring.
Where we fit
Technical diligence addresses engineering and delivery evidence. Legal title, permits, ATR rights, ANRE status and contractual enforceability remain within the coordinated Energy Law workstream.
What we do
We test the technical evidence that changes project maturity, value, bankability, programme, performance or acceptance.
Evidence supporting early-stage, RTB, construction, operational or completion claims.
Design basis, layout, equipment, interfaces, standards and design development.
Methodology, losses, uncertainty, degradation and production sensitivities.
Studies, capacity assumptions, reinforcements, protection, testing and schedule.
How we help
The output is designed for investors, lenders, owners and management teams: material risks, decision gates, accountable actions and evidence still required.
Define the transaction decision, valuation sensitivities and review depth.
Test each material assumption against independent technical evidence.
Report consequences, mitigations, open items and post-closing monitoring.
When we help
For rapid screening of maturity and fatal technical risks.
For full investigation of the investment case and technical contracts.
To close evidence gaps and support conditions, reserves or price discussion.
To align the buyer's technical view with lender requirements.
Workstreams
Evidence supporting early-stage, RTB, construction, operational or completion claims.
Design basis, layout, equipment, interfaces, standards and design development.
Methodology, losses, uncertainty, degradation and production sensitivities.
Studies, capacity assumptions, reinforcements, protection, testing and schedule.
Quantities, pricing basis, contingency, procurement, constructability and critical path.
EPC, supply, O&M, warranties, guarantees, acceptance and interface alignment.
Client scenarios
Separate evidence-backed maturity from seller assumptions across all assets.
Test production, availability, defects, warranties and remaining-life assumptions.
Review configuration, grid profile, degradation, warranties, safety and route-to-market interfaces.
How we work
Define the transaction decision, valuation sensitivities and review depth.
Test each material assumption against independent technical evidence.
Report consequences, mitigations, open items and post-closing monitoring.
Primary sources
These links support primary-source verification; the applicable requirements still depend on project facts and timing.
FAQ
It usually covers maturity, site, design, technology, yield, grid, capex, programme, constructability, technical contracts, warranties, testing, performance and material execution risks.
A red-flag review can start with limited information, but conclusions should clearly state evidence gaps and conditions for confirmation.
They may support valuation sensitivities, conditions precedent, price retention, remediation, contingency, contract protections or post-closing monitoring.
Start with the file
We will propose a proportionate diligence scope and identify the evidence needed first.
